inzilbeth: (Default)
[personal profile] inzilbeth
I've just seen this at Theonering.net. http://www.empireonline.com/news/story.asp?NID=24610
So the whole of 'The Hobbit' is going to span the two proposed movies. My first reaction to this news was regret that there would be no reprisal of Viggo as Aragorn [at least, in this context, I hope there won't be]. But, although that is disappointing in itself, I really don't think stretching a book that is half the size of FOTR over two movies is the greatest of ideas. Only time will tell, I guess.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-04-21 08:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] inzilbeth-liz.livejournal.com
Yes, that's a big worry. You just have to wonder what is going to be invented to fill the time.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-04-21 09:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] estelcontar1.livejournal.com
I'm praying I'm wrong again as I was about LOTR, but I swear I can't see The Hobbit being transformed into two films. After all, they made three of LOTR which is a 1138 pages long book (50th Anniversary ed.). I just can't see how they can make the 300 pages (give it or take it) Hobbit stretch into two films.

In my opinion, it doesn't look good.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-04-22 08:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] inzilbeth-liz.livejournal.com
I quite agree.

September 2012

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags